Rantings Of A Deluded Anonymous Coward

For some years, an Anonymous Coward has been filling message boards, forums and Internet blogs with hundreds of rants about David Myatt and Anton Long.

Here is a screenshot of one such typical rant which makes the usual malicious accusations against the usual suspects:

screen5ab

However, this obviously Myatt obsessed Anonymous Coward has been challenged on numerous occasions, and revealed for what he is: the cowardly anonymous hate-filled purveyor of malicious allegations who never ever provides any evidence for such malicious allegations.


Part The First:

Here are just some of the proven and public failures of this Myatt-hating Anonymous Coward.

1) The Anonymous Coward was asked the following relevant and important question, considering his accusations against Myatt:

” Do you or do you not believe that Myatt is or was a covert operative (an agent provocateur) for MI5, as a great deal of circumstantial evidence seems to indicate? “

He did not answer, except to say that it was an “irrational question”.

When asked why this perfectly reasonable question – asked on forums dealing with the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks – was “irrational”, he did not reply.

2) The Anonymous Coward was asked to provide a link for the so-called “David Myatt Hate-site” which he repeatedly mentioned, repeatedly made claims about, and which he mentioned in the title of many of posts and which he claimed somehow “proved” a link between Myatt/Long and a woman who was physically attacked by some cowardly thugs.

The Anonymous Coward never gave a link to this alleged site. Which leads us to suspect it never existed except in his mind.

3) The Anonymous Coward was asked post evidence for his claim that Anton Long (whoever he is) posted threatening messages on some message forums.

He did not answer.

When it was pointed out to him that anyone could join a forum using someone else’s name, and post threatening messages using that name, he remained silent.

When it was pointed out to him that his much vaunted “screenshots” – which purported to show a user called Anton Long on some forum or other – only showed that some anonymous person fraudulently used the name Anton Long, he remained silent.

When it was pointed out to him that the real Anton Long had never, ever, made any posts on any forum or any message board or on Usenet, he remained silent.

Part The Second:

Here are just some of the claims the Anonymous Coward has made, which have all been disproved.

1) The Anonymous Coward made the ludicrous claim that links posted by other people, who replied to him asking for evidence of his claims, should not be used because people who used them were hacked or had personal data stolen.

When asked to provide evidence for such hacking by such sites – logs from AV software, say; or details of the exploit; or confirmation from someone else – he never provided any.

The Anonymous Coward additionally made the ludicrous claim that the so-called ‘ David Myatt ‘ hate-crime site is infested with malware, even though he gave no link for this alleged site (see (2) above) and even though he provided no details of this alleged malware and gave no evidence to support his allegations. When asked to provide a link, when asked for details of this alleged malware, and for evidence, he did not reply.

2) The Anonymous Coward claimed that the NSM used a Reading PO Box.

When it was pointed out to him that the NSM Box was a London BM box run by Steve S, he made no reply.

3) The Anonymous Coward claimed that the ONA used a Reading PO Box.

When it was pointed out to him that the ONA never had a Reading address, he made no reply.

4) The Anonymous Coward claimed that no one could have “a purely academic interest in the Occult”.

When the absurdity of this claim was pointed out to him – together with the names of several well-known individuals who did have
“a purely academic interest in the Occult”, he made no reply.

5) The Anonymous Coward fatuously claimed that no one could have found an Internet forum message about some attack only 24 hours after it was posted, and claimed that this meant that someone having knowledge of the attack must have been involved with it.

When it was pointed out to him that Google has a 24 hour search facility which enables people to find messages posted in the past 24 hours, he made no reply.

6) The Anonymous Coward claimed that Copeland was David Myatt’s “colleague”, but gave no evidence for this claim.

When it was pointed out to him that both S012 and Scotland Yard’s Anti-Terrorism branch has conducted a full investigation, and interviewed Myatt on numerous occasions, and that they could not find any evidence whatsoever linking Myatt with Copeland, the Anonymous Coward did not reply.

7) The Anonymous Coward claimed to be very concerned about links between Myatt, Long and a physical assault on a disabled woman, claiming that Myatt and Long were somehow linked to this attack.

When asked if he had reported his concerns to the Police, he did not reply.

He was informed that if was so concerned about the matter, then he should report it to the Police. When asked, later, why he has not reported it to the Police, he did not answer.

It was later stated that the conclusion to be drawn about his failure here to report the matter to the Police, was that he was, anonymously, just making malicious accusations on the Internet because he was a stalker with an irrational hatred of and obsession with Myatt. The Anonymous Coward made no reply.

7) The Anonymous Coward claimed that Myatt “had announced to the world that he was converting to the muslim faith.”

When it was pointed out to him that Myatt made no such claim, public or private, and indeed kept quiet about his conversion for over two years, the Anonymous Coward made no reply.

(8) The Anonymous Coward claimed that Anton Long had said that “spastics’ should be drowned at birth”. When asked to provide a link, or evidence, for Anton Long stating this, the Anonymous Coward did not reply.

When it was pointed out to him that such a statement, as he attributed to Anton Long, contradicted Anton Long’s and the ONA’s philosophy and writings, as evidenced in their published works and as stated by various academics who had studied such works, the Anonymous Coward made no reply.

Part The Third:

1) The Anonymous Coward never gives any evidence for the malicious allegations he makes.

When asked to provide some evidence, he resorts to argumentum ad hominem, and either changes the subject, or proceeds to ask irrelevant questions in order to try and disguise his failure to provide any such evidence.

2) When challenged about anything by actual evidence proving his claims and statements to be false, the Anonymous Coward drops the subject, and moves on to make some new allegations.

3) When all else fails, he claims that anyone who challenges him, or his malicious allegations, must be “mentally ill” and/or must be his arch-enemy, David Myatt in disguise.

4) Given his trouncing on message boards and forums, the Anonymous Coward has taken to setting up at least a dozen Internet blogs where he continues to post his malicious allegations about Myatt.

We are thus led to inevitable conclusion that the Anonymous Coward is a serial troublemaker who makes malicious accusations on the Internet because he is a stalker with an irrational hatred of, and obsession with, Myatt.

We are also led to conclude that he hopes that by using The Big Lie Technique – repeating his allegations again and again and again, year after year – that someone, somewhere, sometime, will believe him, and this hope feeds his delusion.

We are also led to conclude that he is somewhat mentally unbalanced and paranoid, and sees David Myatt, and Anton Long, everywhere.

We are further led to conclude that his plethora of ranting malicious Internet posts about Myatt – numbering in the hundreds over several years – have served to increase interest in both Myatt and all his works, and in the Order of Nine Angles, leading to many people to discover and appreciate Myatt’s mystical philosophy of Numinous Way, and leading many others to be inspired by, or become involved with, the ONA itself. So, some good may have come out of the rantings of this particular deluded Anonymous Coward.

Raffy
August 2006 CE